I don’t. I claim that any contrary position either isn’t rational OR requires nonconsensual interactions.
This position comes from my intermediate conclusion that “All interactions should be mutually consensual”, which comes from my premise that “All people are metaphysically equal” and some other unstated assumptions that I am still in the process of identifying.
That is a particular moral position. Why do you call it the only “rational” one?
I don’t. I claim that any contrary position either isn’t rational OR requires nonconsensual interactions.
This position comes from my intermediate conclusion that “All interactions should be mutually consensual”, which comes from my premise that “All people are metaphysically equal” and some other unstated assumptions that I am still in the process of identifying.
Right, sorry, I misread.