The reason I suspect you haven’t is that whether an agent is “myopic” or not is irrelevant to the argument. Where we may disagree is over the nature of goal having, as Seth Herd pointed out. If you want to find a challenge to the argument, that’s the place to look.
The reason I suspect you haven’t is that whether an agent is “myopic” or not is irrelevant to the argument. Where we may disagree is over the nature of goal having, as Seth Herd pointed out. If you want to find a challenge to the argument, that’s the place to look.
It is possible that we also disagree on the nature of goal having. I reserve the right to find my own places to challenge your argument.
Ha, yes, fair enough