I highly doubt you’d get anything useful out of a theologian, even if they did try to defend the argument. You’re much more likely to get pointless rhetoric like an argument that an intelligence explosion is impossible because God created man in his image—and thus human intelligence is the upper bound of what’s possible, since nothing can be more intelligent than the image of God than God himself.
I highly doubt you’d get anything useful out of a theologian, even if they did try to defend the argument. You’re much more likely to get pointless rhetoric like an argument that an intelligence explosion is impossible because God created man in his image—and thus human intelligence is the upper bound of what’s possible, since nothing can be more intelligent than the image of God than God himself.