By “interesting” I mean “of interest to the Less Wrong community”, specifically because they provide insight into common failure modes of cognition, and by extension, cognition itself.
By “subjects”, I mean the topics of inquiry they provide insight into.
Here is an example that should hopefully pin down what I am talking about. I personally have a mental catalogue of such disorders, and given their prevalence in discussion around here I suspect a number of other people do as well. It would be nice if we all had one big catalogue.
By “interesting” I mean “of interest to the Less Wrong community”, specifically because they provide insight into common failure modes of cognition, and by extension, cognition itself.
By “subjects”, I mean the topics of inquiry they provide insight into.
Here is an example that should hopefully pin down what I am talking about. I personally have a mental catalogue of such disorders, and given their prevalence in discussion around here I suspect a number of other people do as well. It would be nice if we all had one big catalogue.