But we won’t point fingers at anyone in particular, no.
Is this intended as a criticism? I can’t tell.
Anyway, steelmanning seems like the standard approach here, if rarely used.
Steelmanning is great, but you can still end up “steelmanning” your stereotype of someone’s arguments, which is more what I’m worried about.
Is this intended as a criticism? I can’t tell.
Steelmanning is great, but you can still end up “steelmanning” your stereotype of someone’s arguments, which is more what I’m worried about.