He said “its presentation is borderline insane”, not “its author is insane”. Argumentative hygiene, please.
(Is there a case for valuing some kinds of insanity because the best contributors to a rationalist group are not always the best individual rationalists for division-of-labor reasons? Should we ever think in terms of “psychiatric diversity”?)
He said “its presentation is borderline insane”, not “its author is insane”. Argumentative hygiene, please.
(Is there a case for valuing some kinds of insanity because the best contributors to a rationalist group are not always the best individual rationalists for division-of-labor reasons? Should we ever think in terms of “psychiatric diversity”?)