The author of that link thinks Popper is falsification. I have already explained why that view of Popper is wrong. Have you been paying attention? And does the author of the link realize that the leading exponent of the multiverse is David Deutsch, who also happens to be the best living Popperian?
Bayesian scientific methods becoming more mainstream is a relatively modern phenomenon. See:
“Do we need to change the definition of science?”
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2008-May/002997.html
...for a recent overview.
The author of that link thinks Popper is falsification. I have already explained why that view of Popper is wrong. Have you been paying attention? And does the author of the link realize that the leading exponent of the multiverse is David Deutsch, who also happens to be the best living Popperian?