This is not unlike Neyman-Pearson theory. Surely this will run into the same trouble with more than 2 possible actions.
No, no real connection Neyman-Pearson. And its fine with more that 2 actions—notice that each action only uses itself in the definition. And u’ doesn’t event use any actions in its definition.
This is not unlike Neyman-Pearson theory. Surely this will run into the same trouble with more than 2 possible actions.
No, no real connection Neyman-Pearson. And its fine with more that 2 actions—notice that each action only uses itself in the definition. And u’ doesn’t event use any actions in its definition.