How fast and accurate the propagation of an update is? I think it is very slow. Often it just stops at the beginning of the chain.
Sometimes it propagates, but wrongly. It causes some new errors in the structure, due to a mistaken reasoning.
This is why, many just copy the whole mind structure chunks from elsewhere, hopping that the reasoning process was properly done there, in the leader’s head. Often it’s a good tactic, sometimes it goes catastrophically wrong.
But recently, with so much of a thinking supply, the quality of the “thought deeply about” may rise. I am not sure.
That’s where such a tool could come in handy. To propagate in a human mind, you must evaluate every belief that rests on the changed belief. And then do it again for the beliefs that rested on the beliefs, etc. At any stage, you can make a mistake in logic and propagate an incorrect belief. A computer would take seconds and would not make such mistakes. You wouldn’t have to believe what the computer tells you, but if it tells you what you didn’t expect to see, it would be a good idea to consider its reasoning.
How fast and accurate the propagation of an update is? I think it is very slow. Often it just stops at the beginning of the chain.
Sometimes it propagates, but wrongly. It causes some new errors in the structure, due to a mistaken reasoning.
This is why, many just copy the whole mind structure chunks from elsewhere, hopping that the reasoning process was properly done there, in the leader’s head. Often it’s a good tactic, sometimes it goes catastrophically wrong.
But recently, with so much of a thinking supply, the quality of the “thought deeply about” may rise. I am not sure.
That’s where such a tool could come in handy. To propagate in a human mind, you must evaluate every belief that rests on the changed belief. And then do it again for the beliefs that rested on the beliefs, etc. At any stage, you can make a mistake in logic and propagate an incorrect belief. A computer would take seconds and would not make such mistakes. You wouldn’t have to believe what the computer tells you, but if it tells you what you didn’t expect to see, it would be a good idea to consider its reasoning.