What I really don’t get at all is how someone could at the same time believe that probability is in the mind and that there is a probability associated with that mind’s location. It seems obvious to me that the second proposition requires a notion of probability that is outside the mind. But without that notion any kind of anthropic reasoning just doesn’t make sense to me.
What I really don’t get at all is how someone could at the same time believe that probability is in the mind and that there is a probability associated with that mind’s location. It seems obvious to me that the second proposition requires a notion of probability that is outside the mind. But without that notion any kind of anthropic reasoning just doesn’t make sense to me.