I’ve definitely found myself talking ideas with AI more often, but as you mentioned it is definitely worth balancing with human conversation. I don’t think it is just “fake” acceptance of AI, but also the quick feedback and ability to immediately get information across fields, which is hard for one person to do during a conversation.
The Cohen Lab at Princeton has some cool papers on interacting with tissue’s bioelectric patterns to organize organoid tissue, which seems to intersect at a lot of the interests you described. The Lab website also has good visuals and high level descriptions if you don’t want to jump straight into a paper.
I also joined a community bio lab and went back to school. Working through physics problem sets by hand and carrying out experiments has helped balance out my perspective with more conceptual AI conversations. Plus, you run into people who may push back your ideas more than AI. Or, at least force you to explain more concretely and from different angels.
I’ve definitely found myself talking ideas with AI more often, but as you mentioned it is definitely worth balancing with human conversation. I don’t think it is just “fake” acceptance of AI, but also the quick feedback and ability to immediately get information across fields, which is hard for one person to do during a conversation.
The Cohen Lab at Princeton has some cool papers on interacting with tissue’s bioelectric patterns to organize organoid tissue, which seems to intersect at a lot of the interests you described. The Lab website also has good visuals and high level descriptions if you don’t want to jump straight into a paper.
I also joined a community bio lab and went back to school. Working through physics problem sets by hand and carrying out experiments has helped balance out my perspective with more conceptual AI conversations. Plus, you run into people who may push back your ideas more than AI. Or, at least force you to explain more concretely and from different angels.