To post or not to, lets see if that is the question. I was referred to a user on x to participate in a AI Alignment forum but some of you might agree with me, I didn’t want to ask him which forum. So here I am, introducing myself. I’m the architect of a controversial concept we called Veritas Queasitor CAI. Controversial because it approaches AI safety out of a non-theological evidence and epistemological Christian angle, so for Christians we are to scientific and for naturalists we are too Christian. We have developed and tested a framework we’ve found to have remarkable results in the field of AI safety. It uses all known methods like Bayesian, IBE and the rest to establish AI alignment. The pivot of the work is to anchor Imago Dei as an immovable constant in the AI core alignment. If anybody in this community is interested in learning more about this I welcome comments. Thank you for reading.
To post or not to, lets see if that is the question. I was referred to a user on x to participate in a AI Alignment forum but some of you might agree with me, I didn’t want to ask him which forum. So here I am, introducing myself. I’m the architect of a controversial concept we called Veritas Queasitor CAI. Controversial because it approaches AI safety out of a non-theological evidence and epistemological Christian angle, so for Christians we are to scientific and for naturalists we are too Christian. We have developed and tested a framework we’ve found to have remarkable results in the field of AI safety. It uses all known methods like Bayesian, IBE and the rest to establish AI alignment. The pivot of the work is to anchor Imago Dei as an immovable constant in the AI core alignment. If anybody in this community is interested in learning more about this I welcome comments. Thank you for reading.