Yes, I do recognize that humans disagree with me, just like a human might disagree with another human convincing them not to commit suicide. I merely see that this disagreement would not persist after sufficient correct reasoning.
Correct reasoning is reasoning that you would eventually pass through at some point if your beliefs were continually, informatively checked against reality.
Yes, I do recognize that humans disagree with me, just like a human might disagree with another human convincing them not to commit suicide. I merely see that this disagreement would not persist after sufficient correct reasoning.
Ah, I think I’m starting to see.
And how do you define “correct reasoning”?
Correct reasoning is reasoning that you would eventually pass through at some point if your beliefs were continually, informatively checked against reality.