Some people claim to be P anti-realists (which BTW is yet another instance of philosophical/strategic overconfidence), but it seems impossible to be a meta-P anti-realist. Unfortunately AIs are even worse at reasoning about P. I don’t know what to do in light of all this, but will keep thinking about it for the benefit of our potential simulators.
I wonder what the agreement voters are agreeing with here… Also, I wonder what the * * * horizontal break in the OP means. What’s separates the first and second group?
Some people claim to be P anti-realists (which BTW is yet another instance of philosophical/strategic overconfidence), but it seems impossible to be a meta-P anti-realist. Unfortunately AIs are even worse at reasoning about P. I don’t know what to do in light of all this, but will keep thinking about it for the benefit of our potential simulators.
I wonder what the agreement voters are agreeing with here… Also, I wonder what the * * * horizontal break in the OP means. What’s separates the first and second group?
The dots separate the first group (which were shared around a few slack meme channels) from the second group (which I added before sharing publicly).