What sort of discussion are you looking for? Negation is fairly straightforward in classical propositional logic, predicate logic, and probability (the bases for Bayesian reasoning).
If questions about personality types are implicitly tied to some particular model, then the proposition “A has personality type X” really means “A has personality type X in model M”, which in turn usually boils down to “A will have (or had) particular ranges of scores in M’s associated personality test under the prescribed conditions for administering it”.
How does negation come into such a discussion? Maybe you want to talk about the differences between negating various parts of that proposition versus negating the whole thing? I’m not sure.
What sort of discussion are you looking for? Negation is fairly straightforward in classical propositional logic, predicate logic, and probability (the bases for Bayesian reasoning).
If questions about personality types are implicitly tied to some particular model, then the proposition “A has personality type X” really means “A has personality type X in model M”, which in turn usually boils down to “A will have (or had) particular ranges of scores in M’s associated personality test under the prescribed conditions for administering it”.
How does negation come into such a discussion? Maybe you want to talk about the differences between negating various parts of that proposition versus negating the whole thing? I’m not sure.