it’s valid critique and highlights the speculation in BH computation (overhead from Hawking decoding, scrambling of input, GR latencies, unknowable interiors). But the model doesn’t rely on it: The theorem proves external silence via density bounds alone (growth intersects finite limit, forcing compact non-emissive states), internals irrelevant, whether computable or not. If impractical, systems stagnate earlier (r≤1, silent anyway). Resolution holds: Thermo + geometry = quiet universe.
Updated article emphasizes this (thanks to feedback like yours)
it’s valid critique and highlights the speculation in BH computation (overhead from Hawking decoding, scrambling of input, GR latencies, unknowable interiors). But the model doesn’t rely on it: The theorem proves external silence via density bounds alone (growth intersects finite limit, forcing compact non-emissive states), internals irrelevant, whether computable or not. If impractical, systems stagnate earlier (r≤1, silent anyway). Resolution holds: Thermo + geometry = quiet universe.
Updated article emphasizes this (thanks to feedback like yours)