I haven’t had much exposure to this discussion so I might be missing something basic, but I am somewhat confused as to what would actually count as evidence here.
It seems that if someone shows behaviour like Allais or Ellsberg that we cand either say: “they’re violating independence” or “the outcomes weren’t specific richly enough.”
With this in mind, are there any possible patterns of choice(s) that would clearly count as a real violation, rather than just something that can be explained away by redefining outcomes?
I haven’t had much exposure to this discussion so I might be missing something basic, but I am somewhat confused as to what would actually count as evidence here.
It seems that if someone shows behaviour like Allais or Ellsberg that we cand either say: “they’re violating independence” or “the outcomes weren’t specific richly enough.”
With this in mind, are there any possible patterns of choice(s) that would clearly count as a real violation, rather than just something that can be explained away by redefining outcomes?