In footnote 2, you write “So McClennen’s book is actually the key source that sets up the three-way taxonomy: naive, sophisticated, and resolute.” But nowhere else in this post do you refer to anything as “naive”, so this is a confusing choice of language.
Honestly that sentence sounds to me like something said by an LLM conducting a literature review which then wasn’t edited to make sure it still flows well in the final version of the post.
In footnote 2, you write “So McClennen’s book is actually the key source that sets up the three-way taxonomy: naive, sophisticated, and resolute.” But nowhere else in this post do you refer to anything as “naive”, so this is a confusing choice of language.
Honestly that sentence sounds to me like something said by an LLM conducting a literature review which then wasn’t edited to make sure it still flows well in the final version of the post.