Contained large mistakes in the past, might still contain mistakes (I don’t know of any)
Reason for inclusion: author went back and corrected mistakes
Didn’t quite reach its goal
Reason for inclusion: it’s good practice to publish null results
(publishing and putting in the year review are not the same thing but idk maybe there’s a related principle)
Reason for inclusion: author went back and corrected mistakes
Reason for inclusion: it’s good practice to publish null results
(publishing and putting in the year review are not the same thing but idk maybe there’s a related principle)