I didn’t give any arguments—you’re confusing me with Larks. Also, my providing sources is not to be understood as endorsing externalism. I’m not sure about it.
Nor was I in fact making any arguments—I was simply stating the position. It’s been a few years since I’ve studied epistemology, so I wouldn’t trust myself to do so. SEP is normally a good bet, and I seem to recall enjoying Nozick (Philosophical Investigations) and the Thermometer Model of Knowledge.
I don’t recall being convinced by any of the Externalist models I studied (Relevant Possible Alternatives, Tracking, Reliablism, Causal and Defeasability accounts) but I think something in that ballpark is a good idea. Externalism has been, in general, a very successful philosophical project, in a variety of areas (e.g. content externalism).
Also, I hate to say it, but I think you would be better off ignoring everything that has been said on this thread. LW is good for many things, but its appreciation of academic philosophy is frankly infantile.
I didn’t give any arguments—you’re confusing me with Larks. Also, my providing sources is not to be understood as endorsing externalism. I’m not sure about it.
Sorry about that. I’ll check it out.
Nor was I in fact making any arguments—I was simply stating the position. It’s been a few years since I’ve studied epistemology, so I wouldn’t trust myself to do so. SEP is normally a good bet, and I seem to recall enjoying Nozick (Philosophical Investigations) and the Thermometer Model of Knowledge.
I don’t recall being convinced by any of the Externalist models I studied (Relevant Possible Alternatives, Tracking, Reliablism, Causal and Defeasability accounts) but I think something in that ballpark is a good idea. Externalism has been, in general, a very successful philosophical project, in a variety of areas (e.g. content externalism).
Also, I hate to say it, but I think you would be better off ignoring everything that has been said on this thread. LW is good for many things, but its appreciation of academic philosophy is frankly infantile.