Firstly, you’re getting mixed up. The Foundationalist side are trying to downplay the Evil Demon Argument as much as possible whilst the Coherentist side claims it refutes Foundationalism as it means nothing can be known.
Both sides plus myself plus practically everybody agrees that just because intuition states X doesn’t mean X is true. So how can you invoke it with any plausibility in a debate?
IF evolution works as suspected, there are still other ways that humans could survive other than correlation of beliefs with reality depending on how everything else works.
Firstly, you’re getting mixed up. The Foundationalist side are trying to downplay the Evil Demon Argument as much as possible whilst the Coherentist side claims it refutes Foundationalism as it means nothing can be known.
Both sides plus myself plus practically everybody agrees that just because intuition states X doesn’t mean X is true. So how can you invoke it with any plausibility in a debate?
IF evolution works as suspected, there are still other ways that humans could survive other than correlation of beliefs with reality depending on how everything else works.