If someone believes in X, they will like the general argument: “If X causes a problem, the solution is to use more X.” But can it be somehow proved, for X = rationality?
Perhaps this is all just one big sunk cost fallacy. Some of us have already invested too much resources into learning rationality—whether so called traditional rationality, x-rationality, or whatever is your popular flavor. Maybe we just refuse to update...
If someone believes in X, they will like the general argument: “If X causes a problem, the solution is to use more X.” But can it be somehow proved, for X = rationality?
Perhaps this is all just one big sunk cost fallacy. Some of us have already invested too much resources into learning rationality—whether so called traditional rationality, x-rationality, or whatever is your popular flavor. Maybe we just refuse to update...