I imagine that seeing progress in these cases and the future of them being unfavourable for the AI companies is also pretty impactful for investors—which seems to be important for the AI companies, or they wouldnt be trying to IPO and raise more money.
We can also see that its important to the AI companies, because they’re spending money and time in lobbying and in fighting these cases, rather than just agreeing to a settlement and agreeing that the harm happened.
We shouldn’t assume that “unfavourable for the AI companies” automatically means that it is good for the world or that they won’t just eat the lawsuits.
We can look at their current and trending behaviour from the past to make predictions.
If you’d like to make a concrete prediction that we both agree counts as an AI company ‘eating a lawsuit’ within the next 6 months, happy to make a bet.
I imagine that seeing progress in these cases and the future of them being unfavourable for the AI companies is also pretty impactful for investors—which seems to be important for the AI companies, or they wouldnt be trying to IPO and raise more money.
We can also see that its important to the AI companies, because they’re spending money and time in lobbying and in fighting these cases, rather than just agreeing to a settlement and agreeing that the harm happened.
We shouldn’t assume that “unfavourable for the AI companies” automatically means that it is good for the world or that they won’t just eat the lawsuits.
We can look at their current and trending behaviour from the past to make predictions.
If you’d like to make a concrete prediction that we both agree counts as an AI company ‘eating a lawsuit’ within the next 6 months, happy to make a bet.