interesting idea; I’d like to see this guy going up and down the abstraction levels.
In the video he described one faith while talking about another. Obviously it’s not easy to put both faiths on the line at the same time and compare them from the inside of one of them. I’d like to see this guy give away the tools to do that. Other than that—this was excellent.
Also worth noting, he could be more generous with giving the position he is reasoning around but not agreeing with a “true position” when describing it. He was very careful to not allow her position to be true when he was talking about it. things like, “you believe X”, “your belief is X”, unreasonably take perspective on an unsuspecting person that their belief isn’t 100% THEtruth. But he was still very good at what he did.
Unfortunately I don’t think he used a convincing argument because religion is not dis-proveable in the conventional scientific evidence sense.
interesting idea; I’d like to see this guy going up and down the abstraction levels.
In the video he described one faith while talking about another. Obviously it’s not easy to put both faiths on the line at the same time and compare them from the inside of one of them. I’d like to see this guy give away the tools to do that. Other than that—this was excellent.
Also worth noting, he could be more generous with giving the position he is reasoning around but not agreeing with a “true position” when describing it. He was very careful to not allow her position to be true when he was talking about it. things like, “you believe X”, “your belief is X”, unreasonably take perspective on an unsuspecting person that their belief isn’t 100% THEtruth. But he was still very good at what he did.
Unfortunately I don’t think he used a convincing argument because religion is not dis-proveable in the conventional scientific evidence sense.