Ah, right. It’s not been that long yet, IMO, but if this continues for (say) 2ys in that no one changes their mind but also ~no one engages with the arguments directly and substantively, that would be disappointing.
In your case, the arguments seem more radical, unlike with arguing for anti-realism where one commonly available reason for not engaging much would be people thinking “I probably have similar enough views already.”
For me, epistemology was never my special interest, so I’m not that well-positioned to dive into the topic and try writing a critique or commentary, but I hope that someone else ends up doing it.
Ah, right. It’s not been that long yet, IMO, but if this continues for (say) 2ys in that no one changes their mind but also ~no one engages with the arguments directly and substantively, that would be disappointing.
In your case, the arguments seem more radical, unlike with arguing for anti-realism where one commonly available reason for not engaging much would be people thinking “I probably have similar enough views already.”
For me, epistemology was never my special interest, so I’m not that well-positioned to dive into the topic and try writing a critique or commentary, but I hope that someone else ends up doing it.