Can belief webs reach the best equilibrium in principle? By default it seems like they might just get stuck in local equilibria: unlike FixDT they don’t have a mechanism to “jump” into the best equilibrium
Maybe you want your belief web to be high-dimensional compared to the intrinsic dimensionality of the decision problems you’re trying to solve(whatever that might mean), so there’s always some room to wiggle towards a better equilibrium.
Hmm, in some sense I’m on board, but also I have an intuition that one of the “problems you’re trying to solve” is something like “getting trapped by your own beliefs”, so a high-dimensional belief web also creates more scope for that.
Maybe you want your belief web to be high-dimensional compared to the intrinsic dimensionality of the decision problems you’re trying to solve(whatever that might mean), so there’s always some room to wiggle towards a better equilibrium.
Hmm, in some sense I’m on board, but also I have an intuition that one of the “problems you’re trying to solve” is something like “getting trapped by your own beliefs”, so a high-dimensional belief web also creates more scope for that.