Christopher King comments on Accuracy of arguments that are seen as ridiculous and intuitively false but don’t have good counter-arguments

[Christopher King]

Hmm, Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer actually has some pretty decent counter-arguments, at least in the sense of making things less certain.

However, I still think that there’s a problem of “the NN writes a more traditional AGI that is capable of foom and runs it”.