There’s privacy, boundaries on the kinds of facts that should be publicly drawn on the shared maps. Not breaking into homes, but also not publishing transcripts of private conversations, and not reading others’ minds. It would be a coherent policy to strive to withhold evidence relevant to some forms of social punishment, generally not letting it get on the shared maps. Which in particular means that the opposing evidence (with positive valence) must also be withheld.
There’s privacy, boundaries on the kinds of facts that should be publicly drawn on the shared maps. Not breaking into homes, but also not publishing transcripts of private conversations, and not reading others’ minds. It would be a coherent policy to strive to withhold evidence relevant to some forms of social punishment, generally not letting it get on the shared maps. Which in particular means that the opposing evidence (with positive valence) must also be withheld.