I haven’t experimented with these ideas on other people, but here’s what I get from introspection.
Metaconversational interruptions can be easier than regular ones. Examples of these are:
Belaying someone else’s interruption of you: “Hold on, let me just finish that thought.”
Pre-interrupting someone else: “I have a question about that, but go on.”
Helping someone else talk: “I think so-and-so had something to say.”
Asking people to pause to let you think: “Can you hold on a moment? I want to think that through and see if I understand that.” (This works best in conversations involving very few people.)
The more you think about propensity to interrupt as a local norm, the easier it is to switch modes. Practice noticing when and how often people interrupt you and each other, and try to mentally tag it as “interesting” rather than “wrong” when they do.
It can be easier to be confident in a question than in a declaration. Practice interrupting with clarifying questions.
My usual advice is to go ahead and introduce the thought, even if there doesn’t seem to be a natural “hook” for it to hang on in the conversation. That might very well come off as abrupt, out of the blue, or even rude… but if your norm is to stay quiet for lack of such a hook, it’s unlikely that reasonable people will be too offended by it. (Unless, of course, they are the sort who are offended when anyone else behaves like their conversational peer, but that’s a bigger issue.)
I meant that practicing by doing more of the easy thing might be a good way to work up to doing any of the hard thing.
There’s also asking a friend explicitly if they mind if you interrupt them, if you have people you’re comfortable enough with to do that. That could be another way to practice first in a low-stakes interaction.
I haven’t experimented with these ideas on other people, but here’s what I get from introspection.
Metaconversational interruptions can be easier than regular ones. Examples of these are:
Belaying someone else’s interruption of you: “Hold on, let me just finish that thought.”
Pre-interrupting someone else: “I have a question about that, but go on.”
Helping someone else talk: “I think so-and-so had something to say.”
Asking people to pause to let you think: “Can you hold on a moment? I want to think that through and see if I understand that.” (This works best in conversations involving very few people.)
The more you think about propensity to interrupt as a local norm, the easier it is to switch modes. Practice noticing when and how often people interrupt you and each other, and try to mentally tag it as “interesting” rather than “wrong” when they do.
It can be easier to be confident in a question than in a declaration. Practice interrupting with clarifying questions.
Those things are easier, but the main thing I have a problem with is when I have my own thought that I want to introduce to the conversation.
I’ll try adjusting my attitude also, and see if that helps.
My usual advice is to go ahead and introduce the thought, even if there doesn’t seem to be a natural “hook” for it to hang on in the conversation. That might very well come off as abrupt, out of the blue, or even rude… but if your norm is to stay quiet for lack of such a hook, it’s unlikely that reasonable people will be too offended by it. (Unless, of course, they are the sort who are offended when anyone else behaves like their conversational peer, but that’s a bigger issue.)
I meant that practicing by doing more of the easy thing might be a good way to work up to doing any of the hard thing.
There’s also asking a friend explicitly if they mind if you interrupt them, if you have people you’re comfortable enough with to do that. That could be another way to practice first in a low-stakes interaction.