My biggest problem with this proposal is that it restricts AGI projects to a single entity, which I think is pretty far from the status quo.
It seems unlikely that Chinese companies would want to split voting rights with U.S. companies on how to develop AGI.
It seems much more likely that there would be multiple different entities that basically do whatever they want but coordinate on a very select, narrow set of safety-related standards.
My biggest problem with this proposal is that it restricts AGI projects to a single entity, which I think is pretty far from the status quo.
It seems unlikely that Chinese companies would want to split voting rights with U.S. companies on how to develop AGI.
It seems much more likely that there would be multiple different entities that basically do whatever they want but coordinate on a very select, narrow set of safety-related standards.
It doesn’t, though. The paper talks about OGI-N as well as OGI-1. In the former version, there are multiple AGI-developing entities.