Duh! In reading your response, it seems so simple, but for some reason when I read “economy” the first time, I just blanked as to what it would mean. I guess I’ve not been active enough around here lately. I understand, now. Complexity, more parts = lower probability by definition, Occam’s razor, etc.
I’m thinking your point is that any phenomenon’s explanation automatically decreases in economy when introducing beings and concepts vastly foreign to observation and experience. Would that be reasonably accurate?
Duh! In reading your response, it seems so simple, but for some reason when I read “economy” the first time, I just blanked as to what it would mean. I guess I’ve not been active enough around here lately. I understand, now. Complexity, more parts = lower probability by definition, Occam’s razor, etc.
I’m thinking your point is that any phenomenon’s explanation automatically decreases in economy when introducing beings and concepts vastly foreign to observation and experience. Would that be reasonably accurate?