Annoyance has a point here. A look-up table is a very limiting model for a subconscious.
What is the benefit you gain by assuming that there is no organizing structure, whether or not it is known to you, within your subconscious?
Personally, I prefer a continually evolving model, updating with experience and observations. With periodic sanity checks of varying scales of severity. Not unlike how I model people.
Of course this lends a resulting bias that I treat my subconscious a bit like a person, with encouragement, care, and deals. This can also lend positive outcomes like running subconscious mental operations for long term problem solving (a more active and volitional version of waiting for inspiration to strike) and encouraging those operations to have appropriate tracebacks to make it easier for me to consciously verify them.
Not sure if that would work for other folks though, cognitive infrastructure may vary.
Annoyance has a point here. A look-up table is a very limiting model for a subconscious.
What is the benefit you gain by assuming that there is no organizing structure, whether or not it is known to you, within your subconscious?
Personally, I prefer a continually evolving model, updating with experience and observations. With periodic sanity checks of varying scales of severity. Not unlike how I model people.
Of course this lends a resulting bias that I treat my subconscious a bit like a person, with encouragement, care, and deals. This can also lend positive outcomes like running subconscious mental operations for long term problem solving (a more active and volitional version of waiting for inspiration to strike) and encouraging those operations to have appropriate tracebacks to make it easier for me to consciously verify them.
Not sure if that would work for other folks though, cognitive infrastructure may vary.