Well, what sort of mistakes has your model made? Is it limited to predicting how well you’ll be understood, or are their other, specific types of predictions that your mental model consistently gives the wrong answer on?
I often do not understand how people could not see something that seems obvious to me. And I have been told by several people that I am oblivious to how my demeanor is perceived by others and I probably have offended some people without intending or even realizing it.
Also I have no idea why this comment of mine is at −2 karma while this one is at +6. To me they look the same.
And recently I thought that maybe my lack of concern for other people could be because some subconscious part of my brain fails to model them as humans at all.
It helps a lot to keep these things in mind, but I have not yet found a pattern of failures that I could easily correct.
I often do not understand how people could not see something that seems obvious to me.
It may help to contemplate things other people seem to understand that you don’t, and what your mental state was before you understood things which are clear to you now.
This sounds like you may be on the autism spectrum, possibly some form of Asperger’s.
As to your comments one at +6 and one at −2, the +6 comment is a succinct reply that makes clear what might otherwise be difficult. The −2 comment is an answer but one that has no hope as phrased of enlightening the person you are talking to, which is why it then resulted in a subthread explaining what you had done. Your phrasing also wasn’t helpful since the problem in question had multiple possible approaches and as you phrased it the other approach was wrong and yours was the only way.
This sounds like you may be on the autism spectrum, possibly some form of Asperger’s.
I don’t seem to show other signs of Asperger’s which is why I ruled that one out.
the +6 comment is a succinct reply that makes clear what might otherwise be difficult
That’s exactly my point. I have no idea why that point might be difficult. It was really obvious to me, so I made something that I took for a sarcastic comment.
If neither of the words “Asperger’s” or “austistic” were used in at least one comment in response to this then something would be wrong:
I often do not understand how people could not see something that seems obvious to me. And I have been told by several people that I am oblivious to how my demeanor is perceived by others and I probably have offended some people without intending or even realizing it.
There’s a large fraction of LW which is on the autism spectrum. Moreover, information about potential mental disorders is relevant if someone then goes to get diagnosed/tested. Question: Would you have the same concern if this were speculation purely about a physical illness? If so, what is the difference other than the social stigma issues?
You have very little evidence here—a couple posts, and a notion that a “large fraction of LW is on the autism spectrum”. I’ve seen some people mention this but I’m not aware of evidence of a “large fraction”. A large fraction would be like 5%, right? That would be about 10 times as many people as in the general population. Do you have evidence of even that much?
I don’t know the actual percentages. There was a poll on this very question a while ago. See here but the sampling issues make it very hard to judge how accurate it is.
That’s actually one of my biggest problems. I think my ability to model other people is way below average.
Well, what sort of mistakes has your model made? Is it limited to predicting how well you’ll be understood, or are their other, specific types of predictions that your mental model consistently gives the wrong answer on?
I often do not understand how people could not see something that seems obvious to me. And I have been told by several people that I am oblivious to how my demeanor is perceived by others and I probably have offended some people without intending or even realizing it.
Also I have no idea why this comment of mine is at −2 karma while this one is at +6. To me they look the same.
And recently I thought that maybe my lack of concern for other people could be because some subconscious part of my brain fails to model them as humans at all. It helps a lot to keep these things in mind, but I have not yet found a pattern of failures that I could easily correct.
It may help to contemplate things other people seem to understand that you don’t, and what your mental state was before you understood things which are clear to you now.
This sounds like you may be on the autism spectrum, possibly some form of Asperger’s.
As to your comments one at +6 and one at −2, the +6 comment is a succinct reply that makes clear what might otherwise be difficult. The −2 comment is an answer but one that has no hope as phrased of enlightening the person you are talking to, which is why it then resulted in a subthread explaining what you had done. Your phrasing also wasn’t helpful since the problem in question had multiple possible approaches and as you phrased it the other approach was wrong and yours was the only way.
I don’t seem to show other signs of Asperger’s which is why I ruled that one out.
That’s exactly my point. I have no idea why that point might be difficult. It was really obvious to me, so I made something that I took for a sarcastic comment.
I’m not sure that speculations about mental disorders are really called for based on these posts.
If neither of the words “Asperger’s” or “austistic” were used in at least one comment in response to this then something would be wrong:
There’s a large fraction of LW which is on the autism spectrum. Moreover, information about potential mental disorders is relevant if someone then goes to get diagnosed/tested. Question: Would you have the same concern if this were speculation purely about a physical illness? If so, what is the difference other than the social stigma issues?
You have very little evidence here—a couple posts, and a notion that a “large fraction of LW is on the autism spectrum”. I’ve seen some people mention this but I’m not aware of evidence of a “large fraction”. A large fraction would be like 5%, right? That would be about 10 times as many people as in the general population. Do you have evidence of even that much?
I don’t know the actual percentages. There was a poll on this very question a while ago. See here but the sampling issues make it very hard to judge how accurate it is.