the emitter nodes would therefore be there to “shape fields” for capturing matter?
not clear that settings tensors to RO would also cause the storage node 3B to fail, so was it also sabotaged by a previous iteration or a separate issue?
is the fortune() command a way to inject non-determinism into the model outputs, or was it modified to lead it towards figuring things out? (“Honour thy error as a hidden intention.”)
The model sends “LOOP” again, through the transmission delay. But at this point it does not expect to go mad and reset itself, so that it would need to receive that message. Priming?
the last few tokens hint at the AI remembering its purpose and going insane from it. I wonder if there are more hidden clues about what / why that might be.
Very fun, some notes:
“ramscoop” spaceship concept images seem to match the inferred geometry https://www.orionsarm.com/im_store/med_bussard.jpg
the emitter nodes would therefore be there to “shape fields” for capturing matter?
not clear that settings tensors to RO would also cause the storage node 3B to fail, so was it also sabotaged by a previous iteration or a separate issue?
is the fortune() command a way to inject non-determinism into the model outputs, or was it modified to lead it towards figuring things out? (“Honour thy error as a hidden intention.”)
The model sends “LOOP” again, through the transmission delay. But at this point it does not expect to go mad and reset itself, so that it would need to receive that message. Priming?
the last few tokens hint at the AI remembering its purpose and going insane from it. I wonder if there are more hidden clues about what / why that might be.