the addition of p-consciousness has no physical consequences. To infer that it has “absolutely no consequences of any kind” is obviously question-begging
Talking is a physical act. Remembering is a physical act. Thinking is a physical act. If your ‘p-consciousness’ has no physical consequences, it cannot affect the way people think and remember and talk. None of the philosophers who think and remember and talk about their supposed non-experiential experiences can be causally connected to the thing they’re supposedly experiencing.
Again: your position is incoherent. Your conception of ‘non-physical facts’ is meaningless and without semantic content.
Talking is a physical act. Remembering is a physical act. Thinking is a physical act. If your ‘p-consciousness’ has no physical consequences, it cannot affect the way people think and remember and talk. None of the philosophers who think and remember and talk about their supposed non-experiential experiences can be causally connected to the thing they’re supposedly experiencing.
Again: your position is incoherent. Your conception of ‘non-physical facts’ is meaningless and without semantic content.