All of this is internally consistent, but I see no reason to believe it gives us a “real” direction of causality.
What do you want out of a “real” direction of causality, other than the above?
Well, Eliezer seems to be claiming in this article that the low-to-high is more valid than the high-to-low, but I don’t see how they’re anything but both internally consistent
What do you want out of a “real” direction of causality, other than the above?
Well, Eliezer seems to be claiming in this article that the low-to-high is more valid than the high-to-low, but I don’t see how they’re anything but both internally consistent