Chains of arguments like these are why the scientific method demands that one makes a claim which is capable of being falsified. If the outcome of a failed test is capable of being the same as the outcome of a successful test, you’ve engineered a bad test. I believe this is the gist of the argument here?
Chains of arguments like these are why the scientific method demands that one makes a claim which is capable of being falsified. If the outcome of a failed test is capable of being the same as the outcome of a successful test, you’ve engineered a bad test. I believe this is the gist of the argument here?