That is, if someone claims to be deliberately doing something, and you have no information to the effect that this action doesn’t further their goals, then you should default to assuming that it does.
How well does this go with all that heuristics and biases stuff we’ve been talking about for years now?
You implied (so it seemed to me) that not trusting the people in question, rather than being hostile to them, was better, or was the sensible default, and that therefore being hostile to them was something that needed to be justified.
Being hostile to people makes them hostile to you. If you’re a human being that sucks. So yeah, some justification would be healthy to have.
How well does this go with all that heuristics and biases stuff we’ve been talking about for years now?
On LessWrong? Quite well, I should think.
Being hostile to people makes them hostile to you. If you’re a human being that sucks. So yeah, some justification would be healthy to have.
How likely is it, do you think, that Carinthium has just not considered the fact that hostility reciprocates?
If you will allow me to suggest a rephrasing of your original question:
“You say that you deliberately act rude and hostile to the people in question. As we both know, hostility reciprocates. Do you find this consequence to be problematic for you? If not, why not? If so, how do you deal with that?”
Does that capture what you wanted to find out from Carinthium? (If not, why not? ;)
How likely is it, do you think, that Carinthium has just not considered the fact that hostility reciprocates?
I think he has considered it and likely underestimated it. My theory of mind is limited to “neurotypicals”, and if he’s far on some other spectrum I have no clue what he might think.
Does that capture what you wanted to find out from Carinthium
It does, thanks. I’m not sure what was so difficult about this. Perhaps I took this a bit too personally since one man’s ridiculous ultimatum wreaked havoc on my grandparents’ psyches quite recently. It’s not clear he knew the damage he was doing. I thought I had accepted his actions but judging from these brain farts of mine I probably haven’t.
How well does this go with all that heuristics and biases stuff we’ve been talking about for years now?
Being hostile to people makes them hostile to you. If you’re a human being that sucks. So yeah, some justification would be healthy to have.
On LessWrong? Quite well, I should think.
How likely is it, do you think, that Carinthium has just not considered the fact that hostility reciprocates?
If you will allow me to suggest a rephrasing of your original question:
“You say that you deliberately act rude and hostile to the people in question. As we both know, hostility reciprocates. Do you find this consequence to be problematic for you? If not, why not? If so, how do you deal with that?”
Does that capture what you wanted to find out from Carinthium? (If not, why not? ;)
I think he has considered it and likely underestimated it. My theory of mind is limited to “neurotypicals”, and if he’s far on some other spectrum I have no clue what he might think.
It does, thanks. I’m not sure what was so difficult about this. Perhaps I took this a bit too personally since one man’s ridiculous ultimatum wreaked havoc on my grandparents’ psyches quite recently. It’s not clear he knew the damage he was doing. I thought I had accepted his actions but judging from these brain farts of mine I probably haven’t.