Interesting! Do you think humans could pick up on word use that well? My perception is that humans mostly cue on structure to detect LLM slop writing, and that is relatively easily changed with prompts (although it’s definitely not trivial at this point—but I haven’t searched for recipes).
I did concede the point, since the research I was thinkingg of didn’t use humans who’ve practiced detecting LLM writing.
Interesting! Do you think humans could pick up on word use that well? My perception is that humans mostly cue on structure to detect LLM slop writing, and that is relatively easily changed with prompts (although it’s definitely not trivial at this point—but I haven’t searched for recipes).
I did concede the point, since the research I was thinkingg of didn’t use humans who’ve practiced detecting LLM writing.
We probably use a mix of strategies. Certainly people take “delve” and “tapestry” as LLM signals these days.