Isn’t it also reasonable in the last case to reevaluate the relative utility of five dollars and of a googleplex lives?
Is it inconsistent in the first two cases that you would believe him (after he shows the extraordinary evidence) if instead of a googleplex lives, he offered to save more than 10?
Isn’t it also reasonable in the last case to reevaluate the relative utility of five dollars and of a googleplex lives?
Is it inconsistent in the first two cases that you would believe him (after he shows the extraordinary evidence) if instead of a googleplex lives, he offered to save more than 10?