If I were to restrict myself to making claims that I could substantiate in a mere ~2 hours, that would preclude the possibility of me sharing the vast majority of what I know.
Using your mathematical analogy, would it help to explicitly assume a few plausible lemmas whose proof can be given later, and derive your main result from them, in order to cut down on the size of the post?
Using your mathematical analogy, would it help to explicitly assume a few plausible lemmas whose proof can be given later, and derive your main result from them, in order to cut down on the size of the post?
Yes, that’s a good suggestion.