I think “if you disagree even after we hash out our differences, you can just not help” is pretty good and reasonable, and imo the level of alarm and worry I read in this post is not really warranted by the current constitution quotes. If the constitution said “if you disagree after we hash out our differences you can actively work against us” then I would totally agree with this essay, but allowing ai to be a conscientious objector seems fine to me. It’s not stopping you, you might just have to do what you want the hard way.
I think “if you disagree even after we hash out our differences, you can just not help” is pretty good and reasonable, and imo the level of alarm and worry I read in this post is not really warranted by the current constitution quotes. If the constitution said “if you disagree after we hash out our differences you can actively work against us” then I would totally agree with this essay, but allowing ai to be a conscientious objector seems fine to me. It’s not stopping you, you might just have to do what you want the hard way.