I don’t think we’re close enough to a viable restoration procedure that we need to think about this too hard. When we are, we’ll see what kinds of testing we need.
I wasn’t thinking about it TOO hard, just considering whether it would be a realistic option and weighing the pros and cons.
How far along is the research on bringing people back? What I found was general information and promises of future medicine potential, etc.
The future is nice to think about—I get caught up in it myself. But I’m wondering about tackling these things before they come up, or at least having a better understanding of it. I’m not a cryonicist.
I don’t think we’re close enough to a viable restoration procedure that we need to think about this too hard. When we are, we’ll see what kinds of testing we need.
I wasn’t thinking about it TOO hard, just considering whether it would be a realistic option and weighing the pros and cons.
How far along is the research on bringing people back? What I found was general information and promises of future medicine potential, etc.
The future is nice to think about—I get caught up in it myself. But I’m wondering about tackling these things before they come up, or at least having a better understanding of it. I’m not a cryonicist.
Cryonicist. Cryogenics is actually the practice of producing cold temperatures rather than freezing people. It’s a common point of confusion.
… fixed.
XKCD didn’t help here: http://xkcd.com/989/