For the purposes of anyone reading: When someone makes a list of two dozen supposed “rules”, then they must also offer a method to prioritize between them—or their claims become unfalsifiable and “not even wrong”, since by cherrypicking rules, one can then explain anything.
They explain less, to the extent that the rules contradict each other. It is unlikely that they explain nothing—in fact they would probably have to be explicitly contrived for that purpose.
They explain less, to the extent that the rules contradict each other. It is unlikely that they explain nothing—in fact they would probably have to be explicitly contrived for that purpose.
Upvote for pedantry