100 pages is quite a time commitment. And you don’t reference any existing work in your brief pitch here—that often signals that people haven’t read the literature, so most of their work is redundant with existing stuff or missing big considerations that are part of the public discussion.
Seconded. Although I’m impressed by how many people have already read and commented below, I think many more people will be willing to engage with your ideas if you separate out some key parts and present them here on their own. A separate post on section 6.1 might be an excellent place to start. Once you demonstrate to other researchers that you have promising and novel ideas in some specific area, they’ll be a lot more likely to be willing to engage with your broader work.
It’s an unfortunate reality of safety research that there’s far more work coming out than anyone can fully keep up with, and a lot of people coming up with low-quality ideas that don’t take into account evidence from existing work, and so making parts of your work accessible in a lower-commitment way will make it much easier for people to find time to read it.
Seconded. Although I’m impressed by how many people have already read and commented below, I think many more people will be willing to engage with your ideas if you separate out some key parts and present them here on their own. A separate post on section 6.1 might be an excellent place to start. Once you demonstrate to other researchers that you have promising and novel ideas in some specific area, they’ll be a lot more likely to be willing to engage with your broader work.
It’s an unfortunate reality of safety research that there’s far more work coming out than anyone can fully keep up with, and a lot of people coming up with low-quality ideas that don’t take into account evidence from existing work, and so making parts of your work accessible in a lower-commitment way will make it much easier for people to find time to read it.