In as much as I’m for cryopreservation (but am having some trouble finding a way to do it in Norway—well, I’ll figure something out), I’ve also decided to be the kind of person who would, if still alive once reviving them becomes technically possible, pay for reviving as many as I can afford.
I tend to assume that other cryopreservationists think the same way. This means the chance of being revived, assuming nobody else wants to pay for it (including a possible FAI), is related to the proportion of cryopreservationists who are still alive divided by the cost of reviving someone, as a portion of their average income at the time.
Once the infrastructure and technology for revival is established, it won’t be very costly. The economic problem is getting that infrastructure and technology established in the first place.
I would guess you’re far more altruistic than most people. Really, as many as you can afford?
I’m precommiting myself to reviving others, if I have the opportunity; on the assumption that others do the same, this means the marginal benefit to me from signing up for cryopreservation goes up.
And, admittedly, I expect to have a considerable amount of disposable income. “As many as I can afford” means “While maintaining a reasonable standard of living”, but “reasonable” is relative; by deliberately not increasing it too much from what I’m used to as a student, I can get more slack without really losing utilons.
It helps that my hobbies are, by and large, very cheap. Hiking and such. ;)
How much do you believe it would cost?
In as much as I’m for cryopreservation (but am having some trouble finding a way to do it in Norway—well, I’ll figure something out), I’ve also decided to be the kind of person who would, if still alive once reviving them becomes technically possible, pay for reviving as many as I can afford.
I tend to assume that other cryopreservationists think the same way. This means the chance of being revived, assuming nobody else wants to pay for it (including a possible FAI), is related to the proportion of cryopreservationists who are still alive divided by the cost of reviving someone, as a portion of their average income at the time.
Thus, I wonder—how costly will it be?
Once the infrastructure and technology for revival is established, it won’t be very costly. The economic problem is getting that infrastructure and technology established in the first place.
I would guess you’re far more altruistic than most people. Really, as many as you can afford?
It’s not altruism, it’s selfishness.
I’m precommiting myself to reviving others, if I have the opportunity; on the assumption that others do the same, this means the marginal benefit to me from signing up for cryopreservation goes up.
And, admittedly, I expect to have a considerable amount of disposable income. “As many as I can afford” means “While maintaining a reasonable standard of living”, but “reasonable” is relative; by deliberately not increasing it too much from what I’m used to as a student, I can get more slack without really losing utilons.
It helps that my hobbies are, by and large, very cheap. Hiking and such. ;)