It seems that a large part of what makes Steve Rayhawk so awesome is that he can make insightful connections between disparate fields by way of reasoning about them in the terms of a larger and consistent framework.
Can you give some examples of this, or maybe even write a post on the topic? I’m still really fuzzy as to what you’re talking about.
Can you give some examples of this, or maybe even write a post on the topic? I’m still really fuzzy as to what you’re talking about.