That sounds plausible-ish. I see some significant disadvantages LLMs will maybe / probably keep having, compared to human writers, even leaving aside “coming up with really new ideas” and such. In particular due to
it’s not a person living in a society with strong norms and living with the mental hardware that those norms are for, so it doesn’t have lived experience with the object (strong pervasive norms) it would be trying to help create
and more generally due to not updating / experiencing things the way humans do, they may not have a good idea of when something is getting boring / when something is interesting (given their target audience and the current zeitgeist etc.). In other words, they may have significant disadvantages in this arena because they can’t gemini model humans very well.
That sounds plausible-ish. I see some significant disadvantages LLMs will maybe / probably keep having, compared to human writers, even leaving aside “coming up with really new ideas” and such. In particular due to
and more generally due to not updating / experiencing things the way humans do, they may not have a good idea of when something is getting boring / when something is interesting (given their target audience and the current zeitgeist etc.). In other words, they may have significant disadvantages in this arena because they can’t gemini model humans very well.