I think “Pivoting AI” makes more sense than “Pausing AI” or “Regulating AI”. As far as I understand it, the demand for technological innovation cannot be “stopped” in any meaningful sense of the word.
Many stakeholders are investing in the best ‘horse’ to cover the technological innovation demand, which happens to be AI according to many. What I am saying is that maybe a more realistic solution is to offer a better and safer technological alternative to invest in.
I think “Pivoting AI” makes more sense than “Pausing AI” or “Regulating AI”. As far as I understand it, the demand for technological innovation cannot be “stopped” in any meaningful sense of the word.
There’s not a lot of demand for human cloning. See https://wiki.aiimpacts.org/doku.php?id=responses_to_ai:technological_inevitability:incentivized_technologies_not_pursued:start
Many stakeholders are investing in the best ‘horse’ to cover the technological innovation demand, which happens to be AI according to many. What I am saying is that maybe a more realistic solution is to offer a better and safer technological alternative to invest in.