Is this why I cannot get anyone to fund my research on AI interpretability even though I am the only person using spectral radii of tensor products to produce more interpretable and mathematical graph embeddings, word embeddings, and dimensionality reductions? I should have no problems with funding my own research on AI interpretability since I am a cryptocurrency creator, but in reality, most people are quite anti-innovative so they would not invest in anything unless the media tells them to.
There are reasons why I said what I did, but I am unwilling to assume that you are ready or willing to have a decent discussion. It is best if we ceased talking about this.
Yes. The LW community is very silly. They do not even know what I have been doing. They just hate because they are anti-intellectuals. They hate me because I have a Ph.D. in Mathematics and they don’t. Not that that matters because universities are extremely unprofessional and still refuse to apologize for promoting violence against me, and I am going to mention this every time I have the opportunity to do so until they apologize. But I would like to be enlightened by one one the downvoters if they have anything to say (unlike Gene Smith). If A1,…,Ar are n×n-complex matrices and 1≤d≤n, then define the L2,d-spectral radius of A1,…,Ar to be
Can you at least tell me why we have a MAX there and not a SUP? And once you tell me that, can you tell me what I should not have spent any time at all using the L2,d-spectral radius to solve problems in cryptography and AI? Because it seems like the people here are just anti-intellectual and hate AI safety got some reason.
Added later: I see that people are downvoting this because they are anti-intellectual and hate mathematics. WHAT A JOKE!
Is this why I cannot get anyone to fund my research on AI interpretability even though I am the only person using spectral radii of tensor products to produce more interpretable and mathematical graph embeddings, word embeddings, and dimensionality reductions? I should have no problems with funding my own research on AI interpretability since I am a cryptocurrency creator, but in reality, most people are quite anti-innovative so they would not invest in anything unless the media tells them to.
I don’t understand what this statement has to do with your research funding. Can you explain?
There are reasons why I said what I did, but I am unwilling to assume that you are ready or willing to have a decent discussion. It is best if we ceased talking about this.
The number of downvotes on this comment is silly.
Yes. The LW community is very silly. They do not even know what I have been doing. They just hate because they are anti-intellectuals. They hate me because I have a Ph.D. in Mathematics and they don’t. Not that that matters because universities are extremely unprofessional and still refuse to apologize for promoting violence against me, and I am going to mention this every time I have the opportunity to do so until they apologize. But I would like to be enlightened by one one the downvoters if they have anything to say (unlike Gene Smith). If A1,…,Ar are n×n-complex matrices and 1≤d≤n, then define the L2,d-spectral radius of A1,…,Ar to be
ρ2,d(A1,…,Ar)=max{ρ(A1⊗X1+⋯+Ar⊗Xr)ρ(X1⊗(X∗1)T+⋯+Xr⊗(X∗r)T∣X1,…,Xr∈Md(C)}.
Can you at least tell me why we have a MAX there and not a SUP? And once you tell me that, can you tell me what I should not have spent any time at all using the L2,d-spectral radius to solve problems in cryptography and AI? Because it seems like the people here are just anti-intellectual and hate AI safety got some reason.
Added later: I see that people are downvoting this because they are anti-intellectual and hate mathematics. WHAT A JOKE!